Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Surfing blue |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 5, getting an 82.6 score against 79.3. Although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is incredibly newer than the Galaxy Note 5, it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a higher number of cores. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a larger aperture and a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.