Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), with a overall score of 79.3 against 76.5. The Galaxy Note 5 is an a lot older device than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), but Samsung managed to make it thinner and lighter. Motorola Moto G Power (2021) counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) also has 7 more CPU cores.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a much sharper screen than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot greater pixel density. Moto G Power (2021) counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Power (2021) features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a way more megapixels back facing camera, a larger camera aperture, a way bigger camera sensor and faster video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power (2021). So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 5, else you can save some money and buy the Moto G Power (2021), resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.