Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-06-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cosmic Emerald |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, getting a overall score of 82.1 against 79.3. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s body is notably newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a larger aperture and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.