Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with a score of 79.3 against 76. Galaxy Note 5's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), even though it was released 8 years before. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a way better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Galaxy Note 5 has a much faster CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has 7 lesser cores (although they are faster) and 2 GB less RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor which gives a way lower image and video quality, and they both have a F1.9 aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.