Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G100 has an overall score of 88.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 score. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G100 has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Moto G100's construction is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, although it is noticeably thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter screen than Moto G100, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Motorola Moto G100 has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G100 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a way better video quality, a back-facing camera with much more MP, a lot bigger sensor and a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video. Motorola Moto G100 counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G100 has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.