Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass; metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 general score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. Even though Moto G200 5G is much newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Moto G200 5G features a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster). Moto G200 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.