Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than the Moto G41, having a 79.3 score against 79.1. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version while Moto G41 has Android 11 version. Galaxy Note 5 is an extremely older cellphone than the Moto G41, but it is a bit lighter and a bit thinner anyway.
Moto G41 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto G41 also has a larger number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G41, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Moto G41 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G41 also has a larger aperture for better images and video in low light situations and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto G41 features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G41 features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.