Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Moto G51 5G's global score of 77.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version while Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 5's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto G51 5G, even though it was released 6 years before.
Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a larger number of cores (although slower). The Galaxy Note 5 features a better screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better number of pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto G51 5G features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G51 5G has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G51 5G also has higher 240 frames per second video frame rate, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture. The Moto G51 5G counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.