Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G60 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with a overall score of 79.5 against 79.3. Although Motorola Moto G60 is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it is thicker and noticeably heavier. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G60 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a better looking display than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better number of pixels per inch of display. The Moto G60 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G60 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Moto G60 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G60 also has 7 more cores. Moto G60 has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video definition and a F1.9 aperture, the Moto G60 also has a back camera with much more MP.
Moto G60 features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.