Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G60s has an overall score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. Although it's the best in this review, the Moto G60s is a somewhat heavier and way thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Moto G60s has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, counting with some nice extra features.
The Moto G60s counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G60s also has a greater number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a little bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Motorola Moto G60s features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
Moto G60s has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G60s features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.