Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G84 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a general score of 80.9 against 79.3. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but the Moto G84 has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, giving you some nice extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy Note 5 has a bit better screen than Moto G84, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels number in each inch in the display. The Motorola Moto G84 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a way better processing power than Moto G84, although it has an inferior number of cores and 8 GB lesser RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G84 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a F1.9 camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Moto G84 also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Moto G84 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.