Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the Moto G9 Power, having a 79.3 score against 78.6. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10. The Galaxy Note 5 is an incredibly older device than the Moto G9 Power, but it's much thinner and noticeably lighter anyway.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has 7 more cpu cores (although slower). Galaxy Note 5 features a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much better amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a larger aperture, higher video frame rate and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Moto G9 Power has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Moto G9 Power counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.