Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass; metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. The Galaxy Note 5 is an older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a higher number of cores. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although the Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.