Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Oxford blue |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 global score. Although Motorola One 5G is newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it's heavier and thicker. Motorola One 5G features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One 5G also has more CPU cores.
Galaxy Note 5 features a more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola One 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger aperture, a lot larger sensor and a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola One 5G has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One 5G features a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola One 5G is also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.