Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a global score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 5's overall score of 79.3. Motorola One 5G Ace is a notably newer phone than Galaxy Note 5, although it's heavier and extremely thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a sharper screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater pixels density.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a larger aperture. Motorola One 5G Ace has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Motorola One 5G Ace is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.