Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5, having a 79.8 score against 79.3. The Motorola One Hyper body is much newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Galaxy Note 5. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has a newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, so it provides the user some additional features and increased performance.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a brighter screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Motorola One Hyper has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher number of cores. Motorola One Hyper features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola One Hyper is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.