Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue and Brown |
| Glass; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 global score. Although the Motorola One Vision is notably newer than Galaxy Note 5, it's just a little heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a better screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Motorola One Vision has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Vision features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Vision also has a higher number of faster cores.
Motorola One Vision captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures.
Motorola One Vision features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.