Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) has an overall score of 81.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. Motorola razr (2022) is a somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy Note 5, but both have the same thickness. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2022) has newer 12 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, giving you lots of additional features.
The Motorola razr (2022) features a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater display pixels density.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a lot better resolution back facing camera. The Motorola razr (2022) features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.