Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 15 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 general score. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a lot higher video quality, a bigger aperture for better low-light images and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 57 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.