Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-03-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Carbon Black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola ThinkPhone's 78.9 score. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Motorola ThinkPhone has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Note 5 body is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola ThinkPhone, even though it was released 8 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola ThinkPhone, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a much greater performance than Motorola ThinkPhone, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola ThinkPhone captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Motorola ThinkPhone features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola ThinkPhone counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.