Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Ocean |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 has an overall score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's overall score of 79.3. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 has newer 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, giving some extra features and performance improvements. OPPO Find X2's construction is newer, but a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
OPPO Find X2 has a superior hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. OPPO Find X2 counts with a display that is very similar to Galaxy Note 5's screen, although the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger display, a little greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a way larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos, a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X2 features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.