Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 score. The Galaxy Note 5 body has the same weight and thickness than OPPO Find X2 Neo. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a little sharper display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger aperture, a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and videos and a way higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.