Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Ocean |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 5, having an 83.1 score against 79.3. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Although the OPPO Find X2 Pro is a lot newer than the Galaxy Note 5, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a display that's just as good as Galaxy Note 5's screen, although the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger display, a bit greater pixel number in each inch of screen and a quite better 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and 7 more cores.
OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.