Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 overall score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11. Galaxy Note 5 is an older phone than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway.
Galaxy Note 5 features a bit sharper display than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater screen pixel density. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50% greater battery size. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a camera with lot more megapixels, a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and better video frame rates.
Galaxy Note 5 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.