Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 79.3 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a a bit lighter cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a little more vivid display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels number per inch in the display and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 5 features a much better battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot more megapixels camera and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.