Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A13 5G has a score of 82.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 overall score. Although Galaxy A13 5G is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it is heavier and thicker. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy A13 5G has a more recent 12 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it gives a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy A13 5G has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A13 5G also has 7 more CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a way better display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also has a camera with much more MP and a larger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy A13 5G's storage for apps and games is very similar to the Galaxy Note 5 one, both have the same internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.