Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G, with a overall score of 79.3 against 77.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is extremely older than Galaxy A15 5G, it's body is lighter and just a little bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has lesser cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display pixels density.
Galaxy A15 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a bigger aperture and a way better resolution camera. The Galaxy A15 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.