Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A22's score of 76.1. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is way older than Galaxy A22, it's design is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter.
Galaxy A22 counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A22 also has a larger number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera with a way lower 16 mega-pixels resolution and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution. The Galaxy A22 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A22 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.