Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a overall score of 84.6 against 79.3. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it offers a couple additional features and performance enhancements. Galaxy A22 5G's construction is extremely newer, but heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a higher number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount in each inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Galaxy A22 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.