Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with a global score of 79.9 against 79.3. Although Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel density. Galaxy Note 5 features a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 7 less CPU cores (although faster) and less RAM.
Galaxy A25 5G has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.