Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with an 82.9 score against 79.3. The Galaxy A34 design is notably thinner and incredibly lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A34 has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Galaxy A34 features a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A34 also has 7 more processing cores.
Galaxy Note 5 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, a back-facing camera with way less MP and a lot tinier camera sensor providing a much worse image quality. The Galaxy A34 counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Samsung Galaxy Note 5, they have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A34 has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.