Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a 79.4 score against 79.3. The Galaxy A35 5G design is newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it provides some extra features.
Galaxy Note 5 features a better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater pixel density. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and 7 lesser CPU cores (although faster). The Galaxy A35 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a bigger aperture for better low light photos and a way bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.