Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it gives a lot of extra features. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it's a little heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a better pixels density. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The Galaxy A52 5G has a greater camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels, a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.