Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52s body is incredibly newer than the Galaxy Note 5's, but it is just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it provides the user lots of additional features.
Galaxy Note 5 has a better looking display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Galaxy A52s features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A52s features a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 7 more CPU cores. The Galaxy A52s has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger aperture, a lot larger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A52s features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.