Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism bricks black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Galaxy Note 5, with a 92.9 score against 79.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has newer 10 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is much newer, but just a little heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy Note 5.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than the Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.