Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 5, having an 84.6 score against 79.3. Although Galaxy F23 is just a little thicker than the Galaxy Note 5, it's incredibly lighter and also incredibly newer. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F23 has a newer 12 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, giving some nice extra features and increased performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy F23 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy F23 also has 7 more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy F23 features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a way less mega pixels back camera and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.