Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy F41 has a newer 11 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Even though the Galaxy F41 is extremely newer than Galaxy Note 5, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. Galaxy Note 5 features a brighter display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy F41 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F41 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy F41 captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F41 also has a way larger camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos.
The Galaxy F41 features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 100 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.