Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's overall score of 79.3. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, although it is much heavier and thicker. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version.
The Galaxy F62 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much bigger sensor, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.