Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is much better than Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has the newer 10 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. The Galaxy M51 is a extremely newer cellphone than the Galaxy Note 5, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater number of pixels per screen inch. Galaxy M51 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 7 more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a back camera with way more mega-pixels, a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy M51 features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 133 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.