Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with an 88.3 score against 79.3. Although the Galaxy S10 is just a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it's a little lighter and also incredibly newer. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S10, although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440px resolution, a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit smaller display. The Galaxy S10 has a better CPU than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a worse video definition and a back camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture and a bigger sensor. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.