Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is much better than the Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 score. Galaxy S10 5G's design is incredibly newer than the Galaxy Note 5's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, providing the user a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a little sharper display than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S10 5G features a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a much bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.