Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass; metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with an 89.7 score against 79.3. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's design is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, although it's a little bit thicker and a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a much better screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S10 Lite shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking images in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.