Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, getting a overall score of 98 against 79.3. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, providing the user some extra features. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it is heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more cores and more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a way better video definition.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.