Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is better than Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. Galaxy S22 is a a little bit lighter device than the Galaxy Note 5, but they have the same thickness.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a bit lower pixels number per screen inch and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy S22 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a much better video quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is way more expensive than Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.