Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body is newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better performing CPU than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.