Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S23's 77.9 general score. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy S23 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S23, but it's much heavier.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S23, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a quite higher display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S23 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S23, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S23 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations and a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy S23 has longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 30% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.