Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's 76 general score. The Galaxy Note 5 design is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14.
Galaxy Note 5 features a much faster CPU than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Single-Core processing unit. Galaxy Note 5 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better screen density.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S24 FE features a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in poorly lited environments and a much less MP camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.