Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a way lighter and a lot thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
Galaxy S25 features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger aperture, a much bigger camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a way higher video definition and a lot more MP back camera. Galaxy S25 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy S25 features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.