Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a score of 90.7 against 79.3. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and noticeably lighter device than Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, counting with a couple additional features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a back camera with a way better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video, a way higher video quality and a way bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.