Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 global score. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Note 5's construction is way lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released 7 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster). Galaxy Note 5 has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixel number in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 5 captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera with a lot worse resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.